The rubric, in full

How the GTM Score works

Every point below is awarded by a rule you can read, from a field a founder supplied or a check we performed. This page is generated from the scoring code itself, so it cannot drift out of date.

Last reviewed 2026-08-22

There is no AI in this calculation. Not in the score, not in the thresholds, not in the reasons shown next to each point. A number presented as a measurement should be one. If the figure were a language model's impression wearing a decimal point, the first investor who scored a company they already knew, disagreed, and asked how it was calculated would stop trusting the platform. So the rubric is fixed, public, and identical for every company.

What the score is, and is not

The GTM Score describes how completely and how strongly a company has evidenced itself against a fixed rubric of 35 checks across 7 dimensions. That is all it does.

It is not a prediction of whether a company will succeed. It is not a rating of quality. It is not a recommendation to invest, and nothing on this platform should ever be read as one. A company with a low score may be an excellent business that has not filled in its profile. A company with a high score has documented itself thoroughly and had some of its claims checked, which is a different statement from being a good investment.

It is useful for two things. For a founder, it shows which parts of the picture an investor will ask about and you have not yet answered. For an investor, it makes companies comparable on the same axes, which a stack of pitch decks never is.

How the arithmetic works

Points, then percentages, then an average

Each check awards points out of a maximum. The checks in a dimension are summed and expressed as a percentage of that dimension's available points. The total score is the plain average of the seven dimension percentages.

The dimensions are deliberately not weighted. Any weighting would encode an opinion about what matters most, and different investors disagree about that for good reasons. Weighting happens on the investor side instead: each investor sets the thesis they actually invest against, and matching is computed against exactly that.

A blank field scores zero

Not an average, not a neutral value. Filling in a middle number for a question nobody answered would be inventing information and then scoring the company on it.

The consequence is that a brand new profile starts near zero and climbs as it is completed. That is the intended behaviour. An unanswered profile genuinely is harder for an investor to assess, and the founder can see precisely which answer would move the number most.

Verified checks are worth real points

Several checks award points only when GTM has independently confirmed something rather than taken the founder's word for it. Those points are the difference between a claim and evidence, and they are the reason the score is not simply a completeness meter. How verification works explains what each check involves.

The full rubric

7 dimensions, 35 checks, 700 points before each dimension is converted to a percentage. Every threshold and every reason string below is read directly out of the live scoring code when this page is built.

Product

100 points

Problem

up to 20
  • 20Answered in full.
  • 15Answered with reasonable detail.
  • 8Answered, but briefly — more detail scores higher.
  • 0Not answered yet.

Solution

up to 20
  • 20Answered in full.
  • 15Answered with reasonable detail.
  • 8Answered, but briefly — more detail scores higher.
  • 0Not answered yet.

Live demo or product link

up to 20
  • 20A working product can be looked at.
  • 0No demo or product link yet.

Product independently checked

up to 25
  • 25GTM verified the product exists and works.
  • 0Not yet checked by us — founder claim only.

Domain ownership verified

up to 15
  • 15Domain ownership confirmed.
  • 0Domain not yet confirmed.

Market

100 points

Target customer

up to 25
  • 25Answered in full.
  • 19Answered with reasonable detail.
  • 10Answered, but briefly — more detail scores higher.
  • 0Not answered yet.

Competitors named

up to 25
  • 25Answered in full.
  • 19Answered with reasonable detail.
  • 10Answered, but briefly — more detail scores higher.
  • 0Not answered yet.

Market size given

up to 20
  • 20A market size figure was supplied.
  • 0No market size supplied.

Industry set

up to 15
  • 15Industry set.
  • 0Industry not set.

Business model set

up to 15
  • 15Business model set.
  • 0Business model not set.

Traction

100 points

Customers

up to 25
  • 25Over 1,000 customers.
  • 19Over 100 customers.
  • 12Over 10 customers.
  • 6First customers landed.
  • 0No customer count given.

Monthly growth

up to 25
  • 2520%+ month on month.
  • 2010–20% month on month.
  • 145–10% month on month.
  • 7Growing, below 5% a month.
  • 0No growth rate given.

Revenue

up to 25
  • 25Revenue reported.
  • 0Pre-revenue, or not reported.

Revenue independently checked

up to 25
  • 25GTM verified the revenue evidence.
  • 0Not yet checked by us — founder claim only.

Team

100 points

Founders

up to 20
  • 20More than one founder.
  • 12Solo founder.
  • 0Founder count not given.

Technical cofounder

up to 20
  • 20There is a technical cofounder.
  • 0Not answered yet.

Relevant experience

up to 20
  • 2010+ years of relevant experience.
  • 155–10 years of relevant experience.
  • 8Some relevant experience.
  • 0Experience not given.

Team size

up to 15
  • 15Five or more people.
  • 10A small team.
  • 5One person.
  • 0Team size not given.

Founder identity verified

up to 25
  • 25GTM verified who the founders are.
  • 0Not yet verified — founder claim only.

GTM

100 points

GTM strategy

up to 30
  • 30Answered in full.
  • 23Answered with reasonable detail.
  • 12Answered, but briefly — more detail scores higher.
  • 0Not answered yet.

Sales channels

up to 25
  • 25Answered in full.
  • 19Answered with reasonable detail.
  • 10Answered, but briefly — more detail scores higher.
  • 0Not answered yet.

CAC known

up to 15
  • 15Customer acquisition cost is known.
  • 0CAC not known yet — this is the number investors ask about first.

LTV known

up to 15
  • 15Lifetime value is known.
  • 0LTV not known yet.

Customers independently checked

up to 15
  • 15GTM confirmed customers exist.
  • 0Not yet checked by us — founder claim only.

Financial health

100 points

Runway

up to 30
  • 3018+ months of runway.
  • 2412–18 months of runway.
  • 146–12 months of runway.
  • 5Under 6 months of runway.
  • 0Runway not given.

LTV to CAC ratio

up to 25
  • 25LTV is at least 3× CAC.
  • 12LTV exceeds CAC, but by under 3×.
  • 0Cannot be calculated — needs both CAC and LTV.

Burn reported

up to 15
  • 15Monthly burn reported.
  • 0Burn not reported.

Customer concentration

up to 15
  • 15Top customer is under 15% of revenue.
  • 9Top customer is 15–30% of revenue.
  • 2Top customer is over 30% of revenue — a concentration risk.
  • 0Not given. Investors will ask what happens if the largest customer leaves.

Company registration verified

up to 15
  • 15Company registration confirmed.
  • 0Registration not yet confirmed.

Fundraising readiness

100 points

Deck uploaded

up to 20
  • 20Deck is on file.
  • 0No deck yet.

Data room

up to 15
  • 15Data room link supplied.
  • 0No data room yet.

Amount being raised

up to 20
  • 20Raise amount stated.
  • 0Raise amount not stated.

Use of funds

up to 20
  • 20Answered in full.
  • 15Answered with reasonable detail.
  • 8Answered, but briefly — more detail scores higher.
  • 0Not answered yet.

Stage set

up to 10
  • 10Stage set.
  • 0Stage not set.

Previous funding disclosed

up to 15
  • 15Previous funding disclosed.
  • 0Previous funding not disclosed.

How to raise your score honestly

There is an obvious way to game any published rubric, which is to write long answers and claim good numbers. It works on the parts of the score that measure completeness, and it does not work on the parts that require a check.

That is by design, and it is why the verified checks carry the weight they do. A profile that is fully written and entirely unverified is visibly that, and an investor reading the Passport can see which is which at a glance.

Inflating a number here is worse than leaving it blank. A blank field costs you points. A number that falls apart during diligence costs you the round, and investors talk to each other.

Common questions

Is the GTM Score calculated by AI?
No. The score is arithmetic over the fields a founder supplies and the checks GTM performs. There is no language model anywhere in the calculation, which is why the whole rubric can be published and why the same profile always produces the same number.
What happens to my score if I leave a field blank?
It scores zero for that check, not an average. Imputing a middle value for a question nobody answered would invent information. An incomplete profile genuinely is harder to assess, and the profile shows exactly which blank field costs the most points.
Is a high GTM Score a recommendation to invest?
No. The score measures how completely and how strongly a company has evidenced itself against a fixed rubric. It is an analytical tool, not investment advice, not a recommendation, and not an offer or solicitation of securities. Investors must do their own diligence.
Are the seven dimensions weighted?
No. The total is the plain average of the seven dimension scores. Any weighting would be an opinion about what matters most, and the score does not hold opinions. Weighting happens on the investor side instead, where each investor's own stated thesis decides what they filter on.
Can I see why my score is what it is?
Yes. Every point carries a reason string, and the profile shows the derivation check by check, including the checks you did not score on and what each one would have been worth.

Score your company against this rubric

Building the profile is free, and you can see every point you gained or missed before you show it to anybody.

Questions: [email protected]

Read next